2022文都英语冲刺内部辅导讲义 英语一[途鸟吧论坛 www.tnbzs.com].pdf

文都网胶花线学司上文都网校2022考研英语一冲刺课程内部辅导讲义信公从阅读、写作尖考研祝您上岸】主讲：陈正康、刘哲文都网校教学研究中心)文都网胶|花线学司上文部网校2022考研英语一冲刺课程微内部铺导讲义(顶阅读、写作主讲：陈正康、刘哲文都网校教学研究中心目录第一部分阅读。2020年英语一阅读，2021年英语一阅读8附录考研英语冲刺抢分必备同义替换词.15第二部分写作.24Part 1总体说明.24Part2必背表达.25Part3必背语句.28Part4常见话题思路.35Part5英语一预测范文45Part6应用文写作重点句型55Part7小作文预测.58Part82019-2021年真题写作范文74文都网胶花线学司上文静网校2022考研英语一冲刺课程内部辅导讲义第一部分阅读2020年英语一阅读Section Il Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts.Answer the questions after each text by choosing A,B,CorD.Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)TF5小Text1L山A group of Labour MPs,among them Yvette Cooper,are bringing in the new year with a callto institute a UK town of cultureaward.The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existingcity of culture title,which was held by Hull in 2017,and has been awarded to Coventry for 2021.Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull,where it brought inf 220m of investment and an avalanche of arts,ought not to be confined to cities.Britains towns,it is true,are not prevented from applying,but they generally lack the resources to put together abid to beat their bigger competitors.A town of culture award could,it is argued,become an annualevent,attracting funding and creating jobs.Some might see the proposal as a booby prize for the fact that Britain is no longer able toapply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture,a sought-after awardbagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Liverpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on theverge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itselffor the post-Brexit world:after town of culture,who knows what will follow-village of culture?Suburb of culture?Hamlet of culture?It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all.A badly runyear of culturewashesin and out of a place like the tide,bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits tothe community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more thanfill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year.They transformthe aspirations of the people who live there;they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder andmore optimistic light.It is hard to get right,and requires a remarkable degree of vision,as well as1文翻网胶引花线学司上文舒网校2022考研英语一冲刺课程内部辅导讲义Text 2Scientific publishing has long been a license to print money.Scientists need journals in whichto publish their research,so they will supply the articles without monetary reward.Other scientistsperform the specialised work of peer review also for free,because it is a central element in theacquisition of status and the production of scientific knowledge.With the content of papers secured for free,the publisher needs only to find a market for itsjournal.Until this century,university libraries were not very price sensitive.Scientific publishersroutinely report profit margins approaching 40%on their operations,at a time when the rest of thepublishing industry is in an existential crisis.The Dutch giant Elsevier,which claims to publish 25%of the scientific papers produced in theworld,made profits of more than f900m last year,while UK universities alone spent more thanf210m in 2016 to enable researchers to access their own publicly funded research;both figuresseem to rise unstoppably despite increasingly desperate efforts to change them.The most drastic,and thoroughly illegal,reaction has been the emergence of Sci-Hub,a kindof global photocopier for scientific papers,set up in 2012,which now claims to offer access toevery paywalled article published since 2015.The success of Sci-Hub,which relies on researcherspassing on copies they have themselves legally accessed,shows the legal ecosystem has lostlegitimacy among its users and must be transformed so that it works for all participants.In Britain the move towards open access publishing has been driven by funding bodies.Insome ways it has been very successful.More than half of all British scientific research is nowpublished under open access terms:either freely available from the moment of publication,orpaywalled for a year or more so that the publishers can make a profit before being placed ongeneral release.Yet the new system has not worked out any cheaper for the universities.Publishers haveresponded to the demand that they make their product free to readers by charging their writers feesto cover the costs of preparing an article.These range from around f500 to$5,000.A report lastyear pointed out that the costs both of subscriptions and of these article preparation costshadbeen steadily rising at a rate above inflation.In some ways the scientific publishing modelresembles the economy of the social internet:Labour is provided free in exchange for the hope ofstatus,while huge profits are made by a few big firms who run the market places.26.Scientific publishing is seen asa licence to print moneypartly becauseAits funding has enjoyed a steady increase Bits marketing strategy has been successfulCits payment for peer review is reducedDits content acquisition costs nothing