分享
college progressivism.pdf
下载文档

ID:3640586

大小:46.13KB

页数:3页

格式:PDF

时间:2024-06-26

收藏 分享赚钱
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,汇文网负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。
网站客服:3074922707
college progressivism
Colleges become the victims of Colleges become the victims of progressivismprogressivism Colleges and universities are being educated by Washington and are finding the experience excruciating.They are learning that when they say campus victimizations are ubiquitous(“micro-aggressions,”often not discernible to the untutored eye,are everywhere),and that when they make victimhood a coveted status that confers privileges,victims proliferate.And academias progressivism has rendered it intellectually defenseless now that progressivisms achievement,the regulatory state,has decided it is academias turn to be broken to governments saddle.Consider the supposed campus epidemic of rape,a.k.a.“sexual assault.”Herewith,a Philadelphia magazine report about Swarthmore College,where in 2013 a student“was in her room with a guy with whom shed been hooking up for three months”:George Will Will writes a twice-a-week column on politics and domestic and foreign affairs.ArchiveArchive “Theyd now decided mutually,she thought just to be friends.When he ended up falling asleep on her bed,she changed into pajamas and climbed in next to him.Soon,he was putting his arm around her and taking off her clothes.I basically said,“No,I dont want to have sex with you.”And then he said,“OK,thats fine”and stopped.And then he started again a few minutes later,taking off my panties,taking off his boxers.I just kind of laid there and didnt do anything I had already said no.I was just tired and wanted to go to bed.I let him finish.I pulled my panties back on and went to sleep.”Six weeks later,the woman reported that she had been raped.Now the Obama administration is riding to the rescue of“sexual assault”victims.It vows to excavate equities from the ambiguities of the hookup culture,this cocktail of hormones,alcohol and the faux sophistication of todays prolonged adolescence of especially privileged young adults.The administrations crucial and contradictory statistics are validated the usual way,by official repetition;Joe Biden has been heard from.The statistics are:One in five women is sexually assaulted while in college,and only 12 percent of assaults are reported.Simple arithmetic demonstrates that if the 12 percent reporting rate is correct,the 20 percent assault rate is preposterous.Mark Perry of the American Enterprise Institute notes,for example,that in the four years 2009 to 2012 there were 98 reported sexual assaults at Ohio State.That would be 12 percent of 817 total out of a female student population of approximately 28,000,for a sexual assault rate of approximately 2.9 percent too high but nowhere near 20percent.Education Department lawyers disregard pesky arithmetic and elementary due process.Threatening to withdraw federal funding,the department mandates adoption of a minimal“preponderance of the evidence”standard when adjudicating sexual assault charges between males and the female“survivors”note the language of prejudgment.Combine this with capacious definitions of sexual assault that can include not only forcible sexual penetration but also nonconsensual touching.Then add the doctrine that the consent of a female who has been drinking might not protect a male from being found guilty of rape.Then comes costly litigation against institutions that have denied due process to males they accuse of what society considers serious felonies.Now academia is unhappy about the Education Departments plan for government to rate every institutions educational product.But the professors need not worry.A department official says this assessment will be easy:“Its like rating a blender.”Education,gadgets whats the difference?Meanwhile,the newest campus idea for preventing victimizations an idea certain to multiply claims of them is“trigger warnings.”They would be placed on assigned readings or announced before lectures.Otherwise,traumas could be triggered in students whose tender sensibilities would be lacerated by unexpected encounters with racism,sexism,violence(dammit,Hamlet,put down that sword!)or any other facet of reality that might violate a students entitlement to serenity.This entitlement has already bred campus speech codes that punish unpopular speech.Now the codes are begetting the soft censorship of trigger warnings to swaddle students in a“safe,”“supportive,”“unthreatening”environment,intellectual comfort for the intellectually dormant.It is salutary that academia,with its adversarial stance toward limited government and cultural common sense,is making itself ludicrous.Academia is learning that its attempts to create victim-free campuses by making everyone hypersensitive,even delusional,about victimizations brings increasing supervision by the regulatory state that progressivism celebrates.What government is inflicting on colleges and universities,and what they are inflicting on themselves,diminishes their autonomy,resources,prestige and comity.Which serves them right.They have asked for this by asking for progressivism.

此文档下载收益归作者所有

下载文档
你可能关注的文档
收起
展开