一周写作day1.pdf

主讲：张明轩PeerInsight 周写作Day 1每作业请上传：dunli_命名格式：群昵称_dayX.doc/docx/pdf希望家尽量上传电版件Reading 4:Demonstratesthorough comprehension of the source textShowsan understanding of the texts central idea(s)and most important details and how they interrelateIs free oferrors of fact or interpretation with regard to the textMakesskilful use of textual evidenceAnalysis 4:Offers an insightful analysis of the source text and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the analytical taskOffers a thorough,well-considered evaluation of the authors use of evidence,reasoning,and/or stylistic and persuasive elements,and/or features of the students own choosingContains relevant,sufficient,and strategically chosen support for claim(s)or point(s)madeFocuses consistently on those features of the text that are most relevant to addressing the taskIntention Effect Logic Rhetoric Writing 4:Is cohesive and demonstrates highly effective use and command of languageIncludes a precise central claimIncludes a skilfulintroduction and conclusion;demonstrates a deliberate and highly effective progression of ideas both within paragraphs and throughout the essayHas a wide variety in sentence structures;demonstrates consistent use of precise word choice;maintains a formal style and objective toneShows astrong commandof the conventions of standards written English and is free or virtually free of errorsNarrative a storyExplanatory an answerJustificatory a causeWho is the author?What is the authors motivation?What is the authors goal?Who is the intended audience?What is the audiences motivation?Logic Plan vs Rhetorical Strategy Intention Effect Logic Rhetoric IntroductionIn a nutshell:Name+title+argument+analysis+effectshook?hook In the essay“Drug Testing in Schools,”the author gives his full support to the court decision that allows randomised drug testing to be enforced in high schools./Through careful word choice,a direct appeal to emotions,and several cause/effect examples,the author built a strong and persuasive case for the randomised drug testing in schools.In his article“The Blue Line:College Athletes Should Be Paid,”Mike B admits that he originally agreed with a majority of public sentiment that college athletes should not get paid,but later on powerful evidence to the contrary totally changed his mind./By using careful word choice,undeniable precise statistics,and effective language devices,Mike B successfully convinces his readers that compensating college athletes is reasonable,fair,and humane.ConclusionIn a nutshell:In a nutshell:Summary+restatement+stressing the topicParting giftThe author of“Drug Testing in Schools”strongly supports the court decision that allows schools to enforce the randomized drug testing among student athletes.He skilfully uses word choice,appeal to emotion,and cause-effect analysis to strengthen his argument.Many readers,especially those who have kids in schools,are likely to give him a thumb up.作业：阅读“Space Technology:A Critical Investment for Our Nations Future”并完成对这篇章的rhetorical analysis