36·理论探索·图书馆杂志（2023年第2期总第382期）LibraryJournal（Vol.42No.2）司法场域中《公共图书馆法》表达与实践（2018-2021）——以法院165份裁判文书为研究样本张健张东禹（江苏大学法学院）摘要《公共图书馆法》司法适用是检验该法立法效果的重要标准，也为推动该法的未来完善提供了观察的窗口。《公共图书馆法》自2018年颁布至今，在司法实践中发挥了一定的作用。对该法颁布实施后的三年来的165份裁判文书统计分析发现，《公共图书馆法》司法适用呈现案件逐年递增、区域分布不均、法院层级下移等特点。司法实践中，《公共图书馆法》发挥了权利主张、价值宣示与规范强制等功能。不过，该法存在宣示性条款较多、直接约束力较弱以及司法适用频率较低等问题。未来，需提高《公共图书馆法》立法质量、完善法院裁判文书说理内容、加大普法力度，更好地促进我国公共图书馆事业进一步发展。关键词《公共图书馆法》裁判文书司法适用DOI:10.13663/j.cnki.lj.2023.02.004EmpiricalStudyonJudicialApplicationofPublicLibraryLaw(2018-2021):ASampleof165CourtDecisionsZhangJian,ZhangDongyu(SchoolofLaw,JiangsuUniversity)AbstractThejudicialapplicationofthePublicLibraryLawisanimportantstandardtotestthelegislativeeffectofthelaw,andalsoprovidesawindowofobservationforpromotingthefutureimprovementofthelaw.Sinceitspromulgationin2018,thePublicLibraryLawhasplayedasignificantroleinjudicialpractice.Throughthestatisticalanalysisof165judgmentdocumentsinthepastthreeyearsafterthepromulgationandimplementationofthelaw,itisfoundthatthejudicialapplicationofthePublicLibraryLawshowsthecharacteristicsofincreasingcasesyearbyyear,unevenregionaldistributionanddownwardshiftincourtlevel.Injudicialpractice,thePublicLibraryLawclaimstherights,declaresthevalue,andenforcesstandardization.However,thelawhasmanyproblems,suchasexcessivedeclarativeprovisions,weakdirectbindingforceandlowfrequencyofjudicialapplication.Inthefuture,itisnecessarytoimprovethelegislativequalityofthePublicLibraryLaw,perfectthereasoningcomponentofcourtjudgmentdocuments,andstrengthenthepopularizationoflaw,soastobetterpromotethefurtherdevelopmentofChina’spubliclibrarycause.KeywordsPublicLibraryLaw,Judgmentdo...
