93•应用研究•2023年7月第21卷第20期中国医药指南不同注射固定方法在患儿皮下注射中的应用效果李夏莲郭华燕罗玉星陈巧平肖云珍*（福建省妇幼保健院急诊科，福建福州350001）【摘要】目的探究不同的注射固定方法在患儿皮下注射中对划破皮肤率、皮下硬结率及针头脱出率的影响。方法选取2021年6~12月入院治疗的300例患儿作为研究对象，按照简单随机分组方法，将其分为常规组和改良组，各150例。常规组采取常规固定注射方法，改良组则采用改良后注射固定方法。对比两组划破皮肤率、皮下硬结率、针头脱出率、一次注射成功率、疼痛程度[疼痛模拟量表（VAS）]、舒适度和家属满意度。结果改良组划破皮肤率、皮下硬结率、针头脱出率、一次注射成功率、VAS评分、舒适度、家属满意度均优于常规组（P＜0.05）。结论在患儿皮下注射中采取改良后的注射固定方法，降低了患儿的划破皮肤率、皮下硬结率以及针头脱出率，同时能够减轻其疼痛感，提升家属的满意度。【关键词】注射固定；皮下注射；一次注射成功率；疼痛；舒适度；满意度中图分类号：R472文献标识码：B文章编号：1671-8194（2023）20-0093-03EffectofDifferentInjectionFixationMethodsinSubcutaneousInjectioninChildrenLIXialian,GUOHuayan,LUOYuxing,CHENQiaoping,XIAOYunzhen*(DepartmentofEmergency,FujianMaternalandChildHealthHospital,Fuzhou350001,China)[Abstract]ObjectiveToexploretheeffectsofdifferentinjectionfixationmethodsontherateofskinlaceration,subcutaneousinduration,andneedleprolapseduringsubcutaneousinjectioninchildren.MethodsAtotalof300childrenadmittedtohospitalfromJune2021toDecember2021wereselectedasthestudysubjects.Theywererandomlydividedintoaconventionalgroupandanimprovedgroupwith150patientsineachgroup.Theconventionalgroupwastreatedwithconventionalfixedinjectionmethod,whiletheimprovedgroupwastreatedwithmodifiedinjectionfixationmethod.Therateofskinlaceration,subcutaneousinduration,needleprolapse,one-timeinjectionsuccessrate,pain(VAS),comfort,andfamilysatisfactionwerecomparedbetweenthetwogroups.ResultsTherateofskinlaceration,subcutaneousinduration,needleprolapse,theone-timeinjectionsuccessrate,theVASscore,thecomfortlevel,familysatisfactionintheimprovedgroupwasbetterthanthatofconventionalgroup(P＜0.0...
