温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,汇文网负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。
网站客服:3074922707
TM_D_4173_
_82_scan
/-of-Y S ASTM D4173 82 0757530 0034134 4 I I Designation:D 41 73-82#Il AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS.1916 Race St.,Philadelphia,Pa.19103 Reprinted from the Annual Book of ASTM Standards,Copyright ASTM If not listed in the current combined index,will appear in the next edition.Standard Practice for EVALUATING SHEET METAL FORMING LUBRICANT This standard is issued under the fxed designation D 4173;the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or,in the case of revision,the year of last revision.A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A superscript epsilon(e)indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.INTRODUCTION A selection of tests is recommended.The major purpose is to standardize the variables possible with available equipment and procedures and to provide data significant to lubrication during press forming.More than a single test will be required to completely evaluate a product.Prediction of a lubricants effectiveness in making a specific part has been based mainly on prior experience with similar processes.T h i s has led to empirical formulations,occasional lubricant failures,and high plant inventories of drawing compounds of similar formulations.Pretesting with procedures effective to lubricant selection relating to end use should make lubricant selection and factory testing more efficient.Existing tests were examined as they related to manufacturing processes.Friction in some metal-forming processes may be reflected to some extent in the four-ball test,disk and b-all,pin and ring,etc.,but they do not include vital factors such as appropriate sheet material used in stampings.O n l y tests that include sheet stock and that reflect other conditions in forming presses are considered to be realistic.It is recognized that a single type of simulative laboratory test cannot closely correspond to the variety of parameters encountered in drawing various parts.Some relationships exist between some laboratory tests and major forming parameters such as stretch and draw.Studies using these tests have led to analytical methods such as shape analysis and forming limit diagrams.Lubrication variations during these tests have been found to rank the lubricants,and a number of industries have been using these rankings in preliminary evaluations.However,care is required to separate the tests significant to lubrication from those portions of the tests which test the mechanical properties of the metal in use.The laboratory tests presently tend to fall into two groups based on sliding of strip stock and cup-forming tests.In the fmt group are strips sliding between flat blocks or draw beads.The second group includes stretching over punch nose,deep drawing,and bending.Factors observed in press forming include:1.Sliding of sheet metal over tooling surfaces=friction 2.Pressure variations on the sheet surface 3.Speed variations during a forming stroke 4.Elongation of sheet metal in one direction only=plane strain 5.Elongation of sheet metal in two directions=biaxial stretch This practice is under the jurisdicfion of ASTM Commitfee D-2 on Petroleum Products and Lubricants.Current edition approved Aug.27,1982.Published December 1982.-.-F t _L_ 1 NOTICE:This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or discontinued.Contact ASTM International(www.astm.org)for the latest information.ASTM D4373 82 m 0757510 0034335 b m-6.Elongation in one direction and contraction in the other=deep draw 7.Bending along a straight or curved line.The relative effect of each factor on the final result is modified by every other factor present.For instance,speed is important because many drawing lubricants respond to it in a non-Newtonian manner.Results are also affected strongly by:temperature,tool surface hardness,roughness,tool geometry such as die ring and draw beads radii,forming and clamping pressures whether application is mechanical or hydraulic,cup size,which parameters are measured and methods of measurement;also specific properties of the sheet metal stock including pertinent physical properties,age hardening,and surface roughness.The preceding factors may or may not be present in a specific test.Those present are:a.Sliding strip test(flat dies)-1 b.Sliding strip tests(beaded dies)-l,-2,4,7 c.Biaxial stretch cup tests-l,2,3,4,5,7 d.Deep draw cup tests-l,2,3,5,6,7 Nom I-Underlined fact&are fact%of greater importance.Tests for complete evaluation of lubricating and mechanical drawing properties would be desired to give data significant to each of the above properties.Standardization i s essential to correlate the data obtained and to determine the applicability of this data to press forming.Although lubrication on different types of test apparatus gives different results,our test results(see Appendix X1 Figs.X1.1 through X1.12)indicate the possibility of similar rankings among drawing lubricants even with somewhat differen