温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,汇文网负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。
网站客服:3074922707
TM_D_3751_
_D_3751M_
_10_2017
Designation:D3751/D3751M10(Reapproved 2017)Standard Practice forEvaluation of Furniture Polish1This standard is issued under the fixed designation D3751/D3751M;the number immediately following the designation indicates theyear of original adoption or,in the case of revision,the year of last revision.A number in parentheses indicates the year of lastreapproval.A superscript epsilon()indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.1.Scope1.1 This practice covers the definition of properties to testand the apparatus to use in evaluating the performance offurniture polishes.1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound unitsare to be regarded separately as standard.The values stated ineach system may not be exact equivalents;therefore,eachsystem shall be used independently of the other.Combiningvalues from the two systems may result in non-conformancewith the standard.1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of thesafety concerns,if any,associated with its use.It is theresponsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-priate safety,health,and environmental practices and deter-mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.1.4 This international standard was developed in accor-dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-ization established in the Decision on Principles for theDevelopment of International Standards,Guides and Recom-mendations issued by the World Trade Organization TechnicalBarriers to Trade(TBT)Committee.2.Terminology2.1 Definitions:2.1.1 furniture polisha polish used for cleaning and im-proving the appearance of furniture finishes.3.Significance and Use3.1 This practice defines the properties to be tested,theapparatus to be used,and the comparisons of product perfor-mance.It is recognized that considerable discretion existsamong formulators and marketers of furniture polish on whichproperties or performance characteristics are best for theirproducts.This practice will be flexible to honor this fact withinthe confines of the furniture polish definition below.3.2 The methods of testing are subjective and empirical inorder to conform to the basic characteristics of the industry andto allow flexibility in testing.4.Apparatus and Materials4.1 Control Polish,selected subjectively for comparison tothe test polish.It may be a competitive product,a modifiedformulation of the test polish,etc.The one stipulation is thatthe control polish be of the same or similar type as the testpolish.For example,if the test polish is an aerosol emulsionpolish,the control shall be an aerosol emulsion polish.It wouldnot be meaningful to select a paste or liquid product as acontrol for comparison to an aerosol emulsion test polish.4.2 Test Substrate for which the test polish is intended.Thetest surface shall be in good physical condition,not badlycracked,scratched,or otherwise damaged so as to interferewith evaluation of polish properties.The minimum test surfacearea for each sample shall be 1290 cm2200 in.2.4.3 Polishing ClothMaterials such as washed cheesecloth,rumple cloth,flannel,cotton diaper cloth,and nonwovenfabrics are suitable for this purpose.The same type polishingcloth should be used with each sample tested.Use separatecloths for each sample.Do not use felt or paper.4.4 Cleaning Solvent,aliphatic,with kauri-butanol valuesless than 38.4.5 Eye Droppers and Tap Water.5.Test Specimen5.1 The test specimen shall be the sample of polish to betested.6.Selection of Testers6.1 The application and evaluation of the test and controlpolishes requires four individuals.They shall be capable ofmaking discriminating judgments of subjective,physical,andaesthetic properties.Training and orientation to specific prod-uct performance characteristics may be required.6.2 Each person applies the polishes to one of the four testpanels.The tester then rates all properties except applicationproperties on the remaining three panels that they did notpolish.The person applying the polishes rates ease of use andother application properties.This means there will be only fourreadings on application properties.The three rating the otherpolish properties do not observe the application because theyrate properties of each polish“blind.”1This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D21 on Polishesand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D21.04 on Performance Tests.Current edition approved Sept.1,2017.Published October 2017.Originallyapproved in 1979.Last previous edition approved in 2010 as D3751 10.DOI:10.1520/D3751-10R17.Copyright ASTM International,100 Barr Harbor Drive,PO Box C700,West Conshohocken,PA 19428-2959.United StatesThis international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for theDevelopment of International Standards,Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade(TBT)Committee.1 7.Procedu